{"id":530,"date":"2018-07-10T13:36:53","date_gmt":"2018-07-10T17:36:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/?p=530"},"modified":"2018-07-10T13:36:53","modified_gmt":"2018-07-10T17:36:53","slug":"morality-and-the-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/?p=530","title":{"rendered":"Morality and the Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last month\u2019s blog post addressed <em>morally responsible<\/em> vs. <em>socially responsible investing<\/em>, and our moral compass here at the Stewardship Foundation. Now, yesterday\u2019s nomination of a conservative Catholic Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh again puts morality in the spotlight. Coincidence maybe, but the liberal media is going nuts. Let\u2019s take a look at a bit of history.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-531\" src=\"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/US_Supreme_Court.jpg\" alt=\"US Supreme Court\" width=\"450\" height=\"253\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/US_Supreme_Court.jpg 810w, https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/US_Supreme_Court-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/US_Supreme_Court-768x431.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px\" \/>Presidents usually nominate individuals who share, on the most part, their own ideological views. However, when then-President Eisenhower appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the courts expecting him to be a conservative judge, his decisions ultimately proved to be the most liberal in the country\u2019s history. When President George H. W. Bush appointed David Souter in 1990, history shows that his decisions most often favored the liberal side. We can\u2019t help but wonder whether the Senate confirmation hearings will recall these two appointments or discount them completely!<\/p>\n<p>In 1953, Samuel Enoch Stumpf wrote an elegant paper on whether the United States Supreme Court decides cases on the basis of moral and ethical value judgment. He wrote, \u201cSuch a question may reveal a misunderstanding of the nature of law as well as the nature of the judicial process. Moreover, to elect the Court to roam in the field of morals may indicate a failure to take into account the limitations placed upon the Court by both our federal system and the division of powers. Indeed, a reading of the Supreme Court decisions for the past twenty years reveals a manful resistance on the part of the judges to intrude their moral and ethical judgement into their decisions\u2026\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/heinonline.org\/HOL\/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals\/vanlr6&amp;div=11\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read the paper here&nbsp;&raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Many would say that the Supreme Court is not supposed to settle cases based on morality but in fact Judges are defined as moral reasoners. The late Justice Scalia himself said \u201cthe courts cannot scientifically demonstrate right answers,\u201d and that it\u2019s the community\u2019s job to determine what it finds morally acceptable, not the courts.<\/p>\n<p>What we find alarming is the rapid pace of society insisting that the highest court in the land make decisions in favor of declining moral values. Every year, Gallup\u2019s question about the current state of moral values in the U.S. aligns with the view that they are getting worse. It will be a fierce debate in the confirmation hearings as the distinguished Mr. Kavanaugh faces a Congress hell-bent on supporting abortion rights, gay marriage, assisted suicide, and every other fetish in the name of diversity, tolerance, and compassion. God help us.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last month\u2019s blog post addressed morally responsible vs. socially responsible investing, and our moral compass here at the Stewardship Foundation. Now, yesterday\u2019s nomination of a conservative Catholic Justice, Brett M. Kavanaugh again puts morality in the spotlight. Coincidence maybe, but the liberal media is going nuts. Let\u2019s take a look at a bit of history. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[44],"tags":[181,179,180,178],"class_list":["post-530","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-moral-values","tag-chief-justice-earl-warren","tag-justice-brett-kavanaugh","tag-samuel-enoch-stumpf","tag-us-supreme-court"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/530","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=530"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/530\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":534,"href":"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/530\/revisions\/534"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=530"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=530"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stewardshipworks.org\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=530"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}