Our Call to Christian Conscience After SCOTUS Ruling

The recent SCOTUS ruling, though far from unanimous, has significant impact on Christian conscience as it pertains to same-sex marriage.

For Catholics it’s especially difficult. St. Pope John II and Pope Benedict both condemned same-sex marriage saying that Catholics are “obliged to oppose the legal recognition of homosexual unions” and where such unions are given the legal status and rights that belong to marriage, “clear and emphatic opposition is a duty.” (Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions Between Homosexual Persons, March 2003).

In 2010, Pope Francis (then Cardinal Bergoglio of Argentina) said that a proposal to legalize same-sex marriage in Argentina was “destructive of the plan of God…a ‘move’ of the Father of Lies (John 8:44) who wishes to confuse and deceive the children of God.”

Then there was Francis’s famous “who am I to judge?” remark that gave hope to the LBGT community but was quickly dashed by later remarks in the Philippines. Pope Francis emphasized that support for same-sex marriage is “ideological colonization…that is trying to destroy the family.” In a speech in Ireland after that country voted in favor of gay marriage the Pope said, “The alliance of love between a man and woman, an alliance for life, cannot be improvised, and is not made in a day.”

Catholics have always been taught that homosexual persons “must be accepted with respect, compassion and sensitivity” and that “every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided.” (Catechism of the Catholic Church).

We at the Stewardship Foundation agree with the Church’s teaching on compassion, and with Pope Francis when he said Christians should not “lobby” for LBGT orientation. We remain steadfast in our support of marriage between one man and one woman and agree with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) who state that the U.S. Supreme Court decision on July 26 interpreting the Constitution to require all states to license and recognize same-sex “marriage” is a “tragic error that harms the common good and most vulnerable among us.”

When Political Correctness is Morally Wrong

America is in decline. We are obsessively committed to diversity, tolerance, compassion, and niceness. Political correctness has become a cancer on our society. We are afraid to voice our religious beliefs and defend the moral issues that are the very foundation of our Christian culture and heritage.

If we oppose same-sex marriage we lack compassion. If we oppose the celebrity status of Bruce Jenner’s one-upmanship on his Creator, we are bigots. If we want learning English to be mandatory for immigrants so they have a chance to succeed in America,
we are divisive. If we support our police officers, we are racists.

In a speech to the Department of Justice in 2009, Eric Holder referred to us as “nation of cowards” on race-related issues. Regardless of our opinion of the former Attorney General, we are cowards—in our discussions of racial tension,
homosexuality, same-sex marriage, abortion, women’s rights, and the rest; the majority of us aren’t speaking out.

Where is the charity, chastity, duty, Godliness, honesty, honor, industriousness, respect for authority, work ethic, and self-reliance? They are here, but they are the new silent majority, standing alone in a cacophony of politically correct noise.

At the Stewardship Foundation, we are not afraid to stand up for what we believe. We courageously ask that if you want to contribute to the rebuilding of America’s backbone, stand up and speak out about your convictions—in your home, at work, in
the world, and with your investing. Please call us for a conversation about how your family or your organization can benefit from our pro-life and pro-family Morally Responsible Investing tools that screen out companies engaged in abortion, embryonic
stem cell research, and pornography. Together, we can make a difference.

Millennials: Hope for the Unborn?

Every year since 1973, pro-life demonstrators have boarded buses and sung themselves silly on the road to the U.S. Capital to join the March for Life. And for the first time in decades, there are signs of hope that Roe v. Wade won’t survive the millennial generation.

The March grew from a couple dozen protestors to hundreds of thousands pouring in from all 50 states and even other countries. Yet it didn’t seem to make a difference with lawmakers. However, advances in medicine and emerging technologies, like the Internet, that help educate youth is having a positive impact on young people. According to a recent USA Today article, millennials themselves are deciding that abortion should not be legal and identify themselves as pro-life.

This year marked the 28th annual conference for Students For Life of America. Attendance was high and demand so huge that the the SFLA had to schedule an extra day of the conference. Speaker Robert P. George, a law professor at Princeton University, applauded the dedication of pro-life leaders and honored the youth that are now seeing “the reality of the beautiful human life of the child in the womb.”

This leads me to share a story we ran across on the SFLA website. Let me just say that Ben (fictitious name) wandered by a “When Do Human Rights Begin?” display at a university in Iowa and asked the question all pro-lifers dread. What happened next is amazing—read the amazing witness ».